Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Henning vs Adil Kalyanpur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Henning vs Kalyanpur analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Henning vs Adil Kalyanpur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Henning 0 - 0 Kalyanpur
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Henning has won 56.21% of points on his second serve, while Kalyanpur has won 44.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Henning, in recent form, has won 53.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kalyanpur has won 51.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.26% and 33.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Henning has saved 60.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kalyanpur has saved 51.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Henning has won 85.45% of matches played (W/L 47/ 8), with Kalyanpur winning 42.31% (W/L 11/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 12/ 5). Kalyanpur has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 63/ 86).
- Player level: In the last year, Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.45% of matches (W/L 47/ 8), where as Kalyanpur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Henning has played against opponents with an average rank of 114.31 while Kalyanpur has played against players with an average rank of 175.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Henning has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kalyanpur has won 83% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Henning has converted 46.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kalyanpur has converted 41.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
523
Rank
523
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
80% (56-14)
Career Total W/L
42% (89-123)
86% (24-4)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Henning | Adil Kalyanpur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 86% (24/4) | 44% (7/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 78% (50/14) | 42% (15/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (360/247) | 47% (159/176) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 92% (12/1) | 29% (2/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (12/3) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 108 | 24 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:21 | 1:38:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 105.36 | 157.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1270/1850) | 60% (604/1013) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (903/1270) | 62% (375/604) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (326/580) | 45% (186/409) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (100/213) | 42% (45/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (827/1950) | 42% (414/996) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 86% (24/4) | 50% (7/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 86% (24/28) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 82% (9/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 67% (6/4) | 10% (10/1) |
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Philip Henning
Player
Siddharth Vishwakarma
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
3
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
6
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
13 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Maik Steiner
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
5
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Dev Javia
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
29 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(7) 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Philip Henning
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
11
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
55 of
72)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Chirag Duhan
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Kabir Hans
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
9 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Philip Henning
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Adil Kalyanpur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
85%
(
47 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
Kevin Cheruiyot
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
32%
(
12 of
37)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
Filippo Alberti
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuvan Nandal
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gergely Madarasz
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
Fadi Bidan
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
Sina Moghimi
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
37 of
45)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuil Konov
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
47%
(
49 of
104)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
11
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Henning Vs Kalyanpur Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
